Book cover for The Kite Runner
The Kite Runner
Alternative book cover of The Kite Runner
About the Author
About the Book
Community Information
Additional Resources


The Morality of Silence: A Discussion

Original Discussion Post from Liz Loftus, Chair, CNY Reads:

"I wanted to share this very thoughtful response from Jerry Evensky at S.U., about the use of the phrase, 'morality of silence.'"

"I think of it this way:  We have a legal right to remain silent, but is silence moral?  As with most moral dilemmas, it's not simple.  It depends on the circumstance.  If I'm being tortured by some fascist/raciest/homophobic/anti-Semitic/(or whatever) agents for information about the whereabouts of someone I love that they want to eliminate, it may well be moral to maintain silence.  On the other hand, if I know of their plans to eliminate someone and say nothing, well .... And what of the intermediate case?  Suppose I know of their plans to eliminate someone and say nothing because I know they will kill my children if I speak.  Moral?

I don't think it's helpful to frame it as the "immorality of silence" because that seems to assume the negative - silence is always immoral, end of discussion.  The "morality of silence" opens the question as to whether it can ever be moral to be silent, and if so ... when."

DISCUSSION RESPONSES

Silence is always a choice, a response to a situation much as saying something or doing something is a choice. The key question is why we choose silence as a means to express our stance on an issue or take action. Morality itself is generally based on "group consensus" and that's why it's very difficult to have universal standards of "right" and "wrong" or norms (This is the reason why "superpowers" tend to use their power to enforce "global" morality). For me, the key question is why people remain silent or take action to deal with a particular situation. So, remaining silent or taking action is not the issue, but why.

Example, which of the following situations are you more likely to remain silent or take action?:

a. physical violence against another person (murder, rape, etc)
b. structural violence (oppression, poverty, low graduation rates, etc.)

Were those who took action against Slavery or Holocaust or the Bombing of Japan, etc., or those who are opposed to the war in Iraq or the war between Israel and Hezbolla more "moral" than those who have remained silent?  Why are you silent or taking action about these situations?

Let's all remember, what is legal is not moral, and what is immoral is not always illegal.

Thanks.
Emmanuel


Well, I'm going to take issue with the statement that silence is always a choice ... it presumes that independent action is always possible and denies the overwhelming effectiveness of oppression. While I am far from excusing people on the basis of "victimhood" the middleclass often fails to recognize the debilitating effects of poverty, ignorance and social constraint. We can hope that the "human spirit" could rise above such conditions, but we also know that "human spirit" needs nurturing environments in order to recognize the options that allow choice to occur.

Joyce


Joyce:
Exceedingly well said! To "poverty, ignorance, and social constraint," I would add "youth." Children may opt for silence in the face of a cruelty that an adult might feel empowered to stand against.
Wendy


May I chime in? First let me say your discussion is wonderful and I thank you for your insights.

I have to agree with Joyce and Evelyn that for many silence sometimes seems the only choice. In silence there is the possibility, even if an elusion, of safety and some relieve from a daily, constant barrage of abuse. I believe in the depth of "human spirit" but when someone has been oppressed and suppressed for years, there is no "human spirit," just survival and coping. It takes a great deal of nurturing to awaken the spirit.

Somewhere in Sister Outsider, Audre Lorde wrote a wonderful essay on silence that has reached many people who have lost their voice. In it, she wrote of the fears that keep a woman silent--fear of visibility, fear of humiliation, fear of shame and guilt, and ultimately the fear of death. But, she went on to write that what so many women have learned is that silence doesn't protect us, for if we are fearful of death, whether it is physical death or the crushing of our self-identity, our strongest and most powerful tools are our voices and our combined strength. While anyone living in an abuse or oppressive situation remains silent she is never quite a whole person, because, no matter how much healing she may do, there will always be that one little piece inside her screaming to be heard. We are expected to be silent and we do so thinking we are keeping ourselves (and others) safe, but in the end we discover that even in silence we are still not safe.

So, at some level, while silence may appear to be the only choice, if we want to survive, it really isn't.

Ester Gray

Excellent opinion, to which I totally agree. There are many times when "privilege" for some is suppression for others.

Evelyn Williams

Back to CNY Reads
Back to The Kite Runner

Last updated: June 5, 2007

WebSTAT - Free Web Statistics